The Total Value of Microsoft Compared to Google
IT professionals in education face several challenges including enabling remote and hybrid learning experiences designed for all, delivering devices that do more with shrinking budgets, and ensuring robust security that's easy to manage and deploy. What factors are important to consider when choosing a technology vendor? This solution brief provides a side-by-side value comparison of solutions and services offered by Microsoft and Google. Download the solution brief when evaluating factors such as device affordability and functionality, device management efficiency, accessibility, costs and security.
What are the benefits of Microsoft devices for education?
Microsoft devices are designed to be affordable and ideal for both remote and classroom learning, supporting a wide range of Windows or web applications. Specifically, Windows 11 SE provides a streamlined user experience tailored for education. Additionally, Microsoft devices come with built-in accessibility tools at no extra cost, which can help improve student performance, as evidenced by a 20% improvement in reading and writing among users.
How does Microsoft ensure device management and security?
Microsoft offers Intune for Education, which supports cross-platform management for Windows, iPad, MacOS, and Android devices. This solution is designed for quick and easy setup with multiple deployment options. Furthermore, Microsoft takes a comprehensive approach to security, recognized by Gartner as a leader in several security Magic Quadrants, ensuring that devices, servers, and endpoints are well protected.
How does Microsoft’s licensing compare to Google’s?
Microsoft's licensing model is generally more cost-effective for educational institutions. For instance, one M365A3 staff license costs $69 per year and covers 40 students at no additional charge, which is more than double the national average student-teacher ratio. In contrast, Google offers student licenses at $60 per year, but requires more licenses, potentially leading to higher overall costs for schools.
Sign in with LinkedIn